Discussion:
Ireland's view of immigration one year since Dublin riots
(too old to reply)
useapen
2024-11-25 09:15:16 UTC
Permalink
A year on from the riots that shook Dublin – have Ireland’s views on
immigration changed?

The riots began shortly after three children and a school care assistant
were stabbed outside a city centre primary school on 23 November 2023.

It led to a night that would see public transport set alight, shops looted
and dozens arrested.

In the year that followed, misinformation on social media has demonised
asylum seekers, accommodation centres have been attacked and the
government is struggling to get to grips with the issue.

Polls state immigration is far from the front of people's minds in the
upcoming Irish general election on 29 November.

But for the first time ever it is a consideration.

The two main issues, housing and healthcare, are both exacerbated by a
growing population.

Average house prices are now 10.8% higher than at the height of the
previous property boom in April 2007, according to Central Statistics
Office (CSO) figures.

The average rent is €1,955 a month nationally - 43% higher than before the
outbreak of Covid-19.

Almost 150,000 people immigrated to Ireland in the 12 months to the end of
April, according to CSO figures - a 17-year high.

These 149,200 immigrants included 30,000 returning Irish citizens.

Despite asylum seekers not being placed on the same housing lists as Irish
citizens, a blame game has begun over whether immigration numbers are too
high.

A makeshift tent city sprung up this year near the International
Protection Office in Dublin with dozens of tents lining the small area
around the building.

The Irish government admitted accommodation could not be provided for all
those coming to Ireland.

Robberies, assaults, an outbreak of illness and scabies afflicted the men
who were gathered there and the government was criticised for not
protecting the most vulnerable.

Rumours and misinformation abounded on social media, falsely accusing the
men residing there of crime, or falsifying their refugee status.

Aoife Gallagher, from the Institute of Strategic Dialogue, who monitors
far right activity says anti-immigrant sentiment is becoming more
organised on social media.

“We've generally seen immigration become a more salient issue in Ireland.
I think a lot of that is down to the reaction to the riots,” Ms Gallagher
said.

“We saw at least five far right councillors being elected during the local
and European elections, all on anti-immigrant tickets."

Ms Gallagher says there has been an escalation of rhetoric and tactics
being used to target immigrants.

"We see consistently, a couple of times every week, horrific attacks on
migrants," she said.

“We see people standing outside IPAS centres waiting for asylum seekers in
order to confront them and intimidate them."

"There's a level of political violence that we haven't seen before,” Ms
Gallagher added.

What do the parties say?

Independents are gaining in popularity, up by four points to 20% in the
first Irish Times poll of the election.

Many of these are standing on anti-immigration tickets.

Almost all the parties running in the general election agree that
Ireland’s current immigration system isn’t working.

Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin have all called for big changes.

Sinn Féin said they would introduce a new dedicated immigration management
agency.

The agency would “ensure cohesion” around planning, sharing of
information, and speedy decision-making.

“The current system doesn’t work for anybody," Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou
McDonald said.

"We’ve chaotic management with different bodies and government departments
acting independently of one another."

Fine Gael said they would implement a means-tested, income-linked
contribution towards state accommodation for asylum seekers.

Meanwhile, Fianna Fáil said they would automatically deem ineligible any
applicant who has already been refused an asylum application in another EU
member state.

All three have been accused at one time or another of “scapegoating”
immigrants.

When the Taoiseach (Irish prime minister) Simon Harris made a link between
immigration rates and the levels of homelessness, the Irish Refugee
Council described Mr Harris' comments as "problematic and not logical".

'People feel very unsafe'

Dr Ebun Joseph, Special Rapporteur Racial Equality and Racism Ireland said
finger pointing at asylum seekers has made Ireland a more tense place.

“People feel very unsafe,” she said.

“You can’t hide your colour. Immigration is first to be blamed for the
housing crisis, thrown under the bus as the cause."

Dr Joseph said she hoped people would "vote wisely" and ask candidates
about their immigration policies.

"Ireland is not going to go back to the day where we are all white Irish,"
she added.

"So if we're not going to go back there, how can we not work together to
make it safe for everybody who lives here?”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4n97wv432o
Niocláiſín Cóilín de Ġloſtéir
2024-11-25 16:22:19 UTC
Permalink
Dear useapen <***@outlook.com>:

(Alpine refuses to post to sac.politics via Eternal September - perhaps it
is a misspelling of soc.politics.)

I had written to the Institute of Strategic Dialogue because Aoife
Gallagher thereof publishes lies on behalves of disinformations on
behalves of murders. I have not gotten an answer from the Institute of
Strategic Dialogue.

However I do believe what she says in news:***@135.181.20.170

On
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:43:06 +0000
I emailed an ISDGlobal.org email address with
Subject: faoi Uisce Faoi Thalamh agus bréaga nuachtán
. . .
"A Aoife ní nó uí Gallchóir agus a Chiaráin uí Conchúir agus a dhaoine
uaisle ag Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian agus a dhaoine uaisle ag an Aontas
Eorpach, a chairde,

Thosaigh mise iarratais sonraí oraibh ar an 28/11/2023. Fanaim le gach
freagra dtaobhanna fós.

Tá an mhoill Shasanach seo in aghaidh dlí, dar leis an Acuity Law Limited.

"You can complain to the ICO about the way an organisation has handled
personal information.

In most cases, before you complain to us you need to have:

complained directly to the organisation;
[. . .] and
followed up with the organisation if you have not received a response
after 30 days."
arsa
HTTPS://ICO.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-complaints/what-to-expect/

Déanaigí freagraí agus ceartúcháin!

Is mise le fírinníbh,
Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester"

On
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:32:41 +0100
I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address with
Subject: Re: ICO Case Reference: IC-282358-B2L2
. . .
"Dear Mister [Stuart] Brierley,

[. . .]

Mistranslations are certainly lethal.

Is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue exempt de laws? E.g. complicity
in murders and torture? E.g. I still do not have a response de it."

On
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:42:40 +0100
I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address:
"Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:"Thank you for the
complaint that you submitted to the Information
Commissioner’s Office in relation to the Institute for Strategic
Dialogue regarding concerns that you have about how the organisation has
processed your personal data."


Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks for responding and for asking for more informations. I am sorry
that I failed to make this complaint clear enough at the start. I
attempt to make progress towards clarity via this email.


Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"Please note that it is also ICO procedure that we do not
handle complaints which concern issues that the organisation has not
themselves first been given the opportunity to resolve.

[. . .]

As such, if you have not taken your concerns to the organisation we ask
that you do so before returning this matter to the ICO. If you have done
so, we ask that you provide evidence of this correspondence and any
response that you received."


I never get an answer from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, so in
response to a question which you had asked when I had started this
complaint ("What are the details of your complaint?"), I had ticked:
"I've not received a response from the organisation."

I had emailed [. . .]@ISDGlobal.org without an answer on 28/11/2023. Cf.
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt

The return receipt that is named
2023-11-28h_cruthu_seachadta.txt
proves that the Institute for Strategic Dialogue got
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt

Similarly
2024-01-03a_followed_up_with_the_organisation_if_you_have_not_received_a_response_after_30_days.txt
and
2024-01-04a_focal_ar_iarraidh.txt
and
2024-01-04f_cruthu_seachadta.txt


Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"After considering all aspects of your complaint, and examining all
evidence that you have provided, the ICO is writing to you today to
request further information from you before we process your complaint
further.

We note that you complaint concerns “front page libels: malicious
falsehoods, misuses of private and confidential informations” and we
have examined the supporting evidence that you have attached to your
complaint form.

We note that as stated above, your complaint relates to the Institute of
Strategic Dialogue, a non-profit think tank, however none of the
evidence you have provided appears to relate to such.

Instead, the evidence you have provided consists of an e-mail to a
company based in Portugal and documents pertaining to two court cases,
both of which relate to different organisations and neither to the
Institute for Strategic Dialogue.

As such, we are writing to ask that you respond to this e-mail
clarifying as to how this matter relates to the organisation in
question."


I apparently failed to convey the role of the ISD to you when I uploaded
2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
when I uploaded to you on 16/01/2024:
"In the British Isles there are front-page libels; malicious falsehoods;
misuses of private and confidential informations; breaches against
confidence and datum-protection legislation & the Communications Act
2003; harassments by publications; & intentional inflictions of mental
harm coverings up this torture and other Portuguese crimes against me
and other migrants. They contradict final unappealable judgments &
proofs. A London organisation perpetrates disinformations on behalves de
these presstitutes and torturers. It is funded by a Portuguese
organisation. It dishonestly pretends that it is against disinformation.
It publishes false reports on a website. It appears on TV and radio.
Illegal disinformations (which caused 3 murders and torture and
persecutions) which are libels and malicious falsehoods against me exist
because of this Portuguese organisation and are essential to the
cover-up by this London organisation that I am complaining to you about.
[. . .]"

I regret to remark that you have responded in English even though I had
uploaded
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
and
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
in Gaelic to you.

2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
and
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
are pleadings against newspaper libels and malicious falsehoods etc.
about me. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue dishonestly pretends that
these lies are neither lies nor illegal. The Institute for Strategic
Dialogue does so via e.g.
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-1-summary.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-2-platform-analysis.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-3-topic-analysis.pdf

Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"an e-mail to a company based in Portugal".

The Portuguese Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation paid the Institute for
Strategic Dialogue out of taxes. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue
obscures crimes by Portugal for money. They could had countered such
crimes so I asked them concerning them. I do not get an answer.
Connivance is complicity. Cf. Article 1 of the United Nations'
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment of 1984.

Cf.
[. . .]

Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"the evidence you have provided consists of [. . .] and documents
pertaining to two court cases, both of which relate to different
organisations and neither to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue."

Actually I provided you with documents pertaining to many more than 3
court cases including pleadings of 2 court cases and a ruling of a court
case before such 2 court cases. Such 3 court cases are consequences of
many early court cases. Journalists and the Institute for Strategic
Dialogue lie about all of my court cases. Indeed journalists are
defendants of many of my anti-malicious-falsehood court cases."

I did not get another response from this ICO. This ICO's professionalism
is doubtful.

Cf.
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Sharon_Tolan_and_Helen_McEntee/Reminding_Helen_McEntee_yet_AGAIN_about_crimes_against_humanity.odt

HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fine_Gael/Fine_Gael.HTM

HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fianna_Fail/Fianna_Fail.HTM

HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Comhaontas_Glas/Comhaontas_Glas.HTM

HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Eilish_Balfe/Lucht_Oibre.HTM

HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Daonlathaithe_Soisialta/Daonlathaithe_Soisialta.HTM

HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Fergal_Landy/Fergal_Landy.HTM
Liam Scott
2024-11-25 19:33:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Niocláiſín Cóilín de Ġloſtéir
(Alpine refuses to post to sac.politics via Eternal September - perhaps
it is a misspelling of soc.politics.)
Parent article contains sac.politics, Ray Banana @ES has probably
screwed up his filtering again.
Post by Niocláiſín Cóilín de Ġloſtéir
I had written to the Institute of Strategic Dialogue because Aoife
Gallagher thereof publishes lies on behalves of disinformations on
behalves of murders. I have not gotten an answer from the Institute of
Strategic Dialogue.
On
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:43:06 +0000
I emailed an ISDGlobal.org email address with
Subject: faoi Uisce Faoi Thalamh agus bréaga nuachtán
. . .
"A Aoife ní nó uí Gallchóir agus a Chiaráin uí Conchúir agus a dhaoine
uaisle ag Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian agus a dhaoine uaisle ag an
Aontas Eorpach, a chairde,
Thosaigh mise iarratais sonraí oraibh ar an 28/11/2023. Fanaim le gach
freagra dtaobhanna fós.
Tá an mhoill Shasanach seo in aghaidh dlí, dar leis an Acuity Law Limited.
"You can complain to the ICO about the way an organisation has handled
personal information.
complained directly to the organisation;
[. . .] and
followed up with the organisation if you have not received a response
after 30 days."
arsa
HTTPS://ICO.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-complaints/what-to-expect/
Déanaigí freagraí agus ceartúcháin!
Is mise le fírinníbh,
Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester"
On
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:32:41 +0100
I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address with
Subject: Re: ICO Case Reference: IC-282358-B2L2
. . .
"Dear Mister [Stuart] Brierley,
[. . .]
Mistranslations are certainly lethal.
Is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue exempt de laws? E.g. complicity
in murders and torture? E.g. I still do not have a response de it."
On
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:42:40 +0100
"Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:"Thank you for the
complaint that you submitted to the Information
Commissioner’s Office in relation to the Institute for Strategic
Dialogue regarding concerns that you have about how the organisation has
processed your personal data."
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thanks for responding and for asking for more informations. I am sorry
that I failed to make this complaint clear enough at the start. I
attempt to make progress towards clarity via this email.
"Please note that it is also ICO procedure that we do not
handle complaints which concern issues that the organisation has not
themselves first been given the opportunity to resolve.
[. . .]
As such, if you have not taken your concerns to the organisation we ask
that you do so before returning this matter to the ICO. If you have done
so, we ask that you provide evidence of this correspondence and any
response that you received."
I never get an answer from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, so in
response to a question which you had asked when I had started this
"I've not received a response from the organisation."
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
The return receipt that is named
2023-11-28h_cruthu_seachadta.txt
proves that the Institute for Strategic Dialogue got
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
Similarly
2024-01-03a_followed_up_with_the_organisation_if_you_have_not_received_a_response_after_30_days.txt
and
2024-01-04a_focal_ar_iarraidh.txt
and
2024-01-04f_cruthu_seachadta.txt
"After considering all aspects of your complaint, and examining all
evidence that you have provided, the ICO is writing to you today to
request further information from you before we process your complaint
further.
We note that you complaint concerns “front page libels: malicious
falsehoods, misuses of private and confidential informations” and we
have examined the supporting evidence that you have attached to your
complaint form.
We note that as stated above, your complaint relates to the Institute of
Strategic Dialogue, a non-profit think tank, however none of the
evidence you have provided appears to relate to such.
Instead, the evidence you have provided consists of an e-mail to a
company based in Portugal and documents pertaining to two court cases,
both of which relate to different organisations and neither to the
Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
As such, we are writing to ask that you respond to this e-mail
clarifying as to how this matter relates to the organisation in
question."
I apparently failed to convey the role of the ISD to you when I uploaded
2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
"In the British Isles there are front-page libels; malicious falsehoods;
misuses of private and confidential informations; breaches against
confidence and datum-protection legislation & the Communications Act
2003; harassments by publications; & intentional inflictions of mental
harm coverings up this torture and other Portuguese crimes against me
and other migrants. They contradict final unappealable judgments &
proofs. A London organisation perpetrates disinformations on behalves de
these presstitutes and torturers. It is funded by a Portuguese
organisation. It dishonestly pretends that it is against disinformation.
It publishes false reports on a website. It appears on TV and radio.
Illegal disinformations (which caused 3 murders and torture and
persecutions) which are libels and malicious falsehoods against me exist
because of this Portuguese organisation and are essential to the
cover-up by this London organisation that I am complaining to you about.
[. . .]"
I regret to remark that you have responded in English even though I had
uploaded
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
and
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
in Gaelic to you.
2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
and
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
are pleadings against newspaper libels and malicious falsehoods etc.
about me. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue dishonestly pretends that
these lies are neither lies nor illegal. The Institute for Strategic
Dialogue does so via e.g.
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-1-summary.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-2-platform-analysis.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-3-topic-analysis.pdf
"an e-mail to a company based in Portugal".
The Portuguese Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation paid the Institute for
Strategic Dialogue out of taxes. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue
obscures crimes by Portugal for money. They could had countered such
crimes so I asked them concerning them. I do not get an answer.
Connivance is complicity. Cf. Article 1 of the United Nations'
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment of 1984.
Cf.
[. . .]
"the evidence you have provided consists of [. . .] and documents
pertaining to two court cases, both of which relate to different
organisations and neither to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue."
Actually I provided you with documents pertaining to many more than 3
court cases including pleadings of 2 court cases and a ruling of a court
case before such 2 court cases. Such 3 court cases are consequences of
many early court cases. Journalists and the Institute for Strategic
Dialogue lie about all of my court cases. Indeed journalists are
defendants of many of my anti-malicious-falsehood court cases."
I did not get another response from this ICO. This ICO's professionalism
is doubtful.
Cf.
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Sharon_Tolan_and_Helen_McEntee/Reminding_Helen_McEntee_yet_AGAIN_about_crimes_against_humanity.odt
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fine_Gael/Fine_Gael.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fianna_Fail/Fianna_Fail.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Comhaontas_Glas/Comhaontas_Glas.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Eilish_Balfe/Lucht_Oibre.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Daonlathaithe_Soisialta/Daonlathaithe_Soisialta.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Fergal_Landy/Fergal_Landy.HTM
So you're an immigrant?
Niocláiſín Cóilín de Ġloſtéir
2024-11-25 22:55:56 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024, Liam Scott wrote:
"So you're an immigrant?"

Oui !

Cf.
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/
especially
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/translations/2011-07-13_pleading_by_racist_defendants__Pages01-13__Translation3.docx
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/translations/2011-xy-za_or_2012-xy-za_Parecer_juridico_-_estrangeiros_-_concurso_bolsas_2011_Translation2.docx
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/2012-10-14_pleading_against_discrimination.pdf
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/2013-05-03_judgment_against_racist_defendants.pdf
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/2014-08-01_Pleading_against_libel.pdf
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/2016-11-17_public_prosecutrix_who_signed_court_order_to_torture_Gloster_prevents_process_from_reaching_court.pdf
and
HTTP://gloucester.insomnia247.nl/Ricardo_Namora_de_Melo_Teixeira/2024-10-21/prioritised_documents/2020-11-27_by_3_judges_ordering_payment_of_a_scholarship.pdf
Loading...